Over the past 12 months 85% of the UK’s top FTSE 350 listed companies have not significantly changed their asset allocation. Of the 15% that have made significant investment decisions, few have diversified, according to Schroders’ second FTSE DC report.
Instead, the overwhelming majority of schemes continue to implement an approach that is highly equity dependent.
Go deeper with GlobalData
Access deeper industry intelligence
Experience unmatched clarity with a single platform that combines unique data, AI, and human expertise.
Looking at the overall annual comparison (2012 – 2013), typical asset allocation to equities of FTSE 350 companies remains at 84%. Within this there has been a fall of nearly 2% in allocation in UK Equities to 31% and Global Equity holdings have risen by almost 2% to 48%.
Fixed Income weighting has reduced to 8% down from 9.2%. There has been no change in Alternatives with the average asset allocation at 8% over the past 12 months.
Specifically, FTSE 100 companies have only made marginal changes, with the largest being a 2% increase in emerging markets allocation to 5%. In contrast, FTSE 250 schemes have made greater alterations, with a 5% decrease in UK equities to 36% and 4% rise in global equities to 48%.
Stephen Bowles, head of defined contribution, Schroders, said: "Our FTSE DC research clearly illustrates that whilst some schemes certainly employ elements of diversification, few do so effectively. Instead the overwhelming majority of schemes continue to implement an approach that is highly equity dependent. It has been disappointing to see that there has been no change in the allocation to Alternatives over the past 12 months, a rather underutilised asset class.
US Tariffs are shifting - will you react or anticipate?
Don’t let policy changes catch you off guard. Stay proactive with real-time data and expert analysis.
By GlobalData"What is perhaps most interesting is that it is only in cases where a scheme has either replaced or appointed additional fund managers that progressive changes have been made to diversify – this represents 12% of all schemes. This is particularly significant as through their differing investment strategies, multiple managers add an additional element of diversity alongside allocations. It will be interesting to see if this is a trend that continues to develop in the months ahead."
