Financial consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) has agreed to pay US$25 million to settle New York state regulators’ allegations that it failed to report on money-laundering activities at the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ.

Under pressure from BTMU executives, PwC removed a warning in an ostensibly "objective" report to regulators surrounding the bank’s scheme to falsify wire transfer information for Iran, Sudan, and other sanctioned entities, the regulator said in a statement.

Access deeper industry intelligence

Experience unmatched clarity with a single platform that combines unique data, AI, and human expertise.

Find out more

The deal also prevents the firm’s regulatory consulting unit from performing certain assignments on behalf of New York-regulated banks for two years.

New York superintendent of financial services, Benjamin Lawsky, said: "We are continuing to find examples of improper influence and misconduct in the bank consulting industry. As a regulatory community, it may well be advisable for us to take a hard look in the mirror and ask whether we are doing enough to root out and investigate this troubling web of conflicts.

"When bank executives pressure a consultant to whitewash a supposedly ‘objective’ report to regulators – and the consultant goes along with it – that can strike at the very heart of our system of prudential oversight."

The firm was not accused of a legal violation. Lawsky, who took a similar action against Deloitte last year, accused PwC of failing to demonstrate the objectivity and integrity expected of bank consultants.

GlobalData Strategic Intelligence

US Tariffs are shifting - will you react or anticipate?

Don’t let policy changes catch you off guard. Stay proactive with real-time data and expert analysis.

By GlobalData

The case is part of a broader examination of conflicts of interest that plague the consulting industry. The consultants are handpicked and paid by the banks they are supposed to examine.