Family businesses are prolific in traditional sectors like construction and the car industry, but many later diversify into high-tech businesses outside of their core activities. The reasons for doing this, and the way in which they do this, are often different from other types of investors, like venture capitalists and business angels.

Sometimes families are just pursuing an opportunity to make money and diversify their financial portfolio in the same way as these other investors, but there are often other motivations that are unique to family enterprises.

Some will decide to diversify their enterprise and change direction to match the skills or interests of their successors. If the next generation has made it clear that they do not want to take over the business started by their ancestors, but the family still wants to remain in business together, they need to diversify.

The catalyst might also be the desire to give the next generation an opportunity to pursue their own business ideas and to learn what it is like to establish and grow a business. These families believe that the best way to learn about business is to run your own.

No doubt financially astute families will consider the financial risks of such a decision, but the family’s investment will be partly because they feel easier about investing in the high-tech ambitions of a relative compared to backing strangers. This attitude has potential advantages and disadvantages.

The main benefit is that the family often invests on favourable terms and are prepared to wait longer for the return on investment because they are investing in one of their own. But the downside is that this may inadvertently reduce the drive to generate a return and the family’s patient capital is exploited unfairly.

GlobalData Strategic Intelligence

US Tariffs are shifting - will you react or anticipate?

Don’t let policy changes catch you off guard. Stay proactive with real-time data and expert analysis.

By GlobalData

Then what happens if the investment does not work out as planned? Will the family be forgiving because they had accepted the commercial risk of failure, and because they are less likely to criticise a relative? Or will failure lead to strained family relationships and put more than money at risk if the investment flounders?

The family’s reaction to failure depends on their innate attitude to risk. They may be naturally conservative and concerned about preserving, or not losing, wealth, which is an attitude common among those who have inherited a fortune. For them, high-tech investment in support of a relative’s entrepreneurial ambitions is fraught with the risk that failure may lead to feelings of shame and then to broken relationships.

One family’s approach to high-tech investing was to raise a fund that would support ventures into new technologies that either might be useful to the family’s core business or could benefit from the core business’s other resources, such as access to distribution channels and international trade connections.

The fund was the idea of two family members who wanted independence to do something on their own while remaining useful to the core business. They needed to do this in order to pursue their own aspirations while dealing with their feelings of loyalty and duty to their family of origin.

Family members were invited as individuals to invest in the fund but always on the same terms as external investors, and it was agreed that the family business itself would not be an investor.

The growth of technology, and the level of competition faced by any ambitious business in our era, makes diversification into alternative businesses a viable option for those who wish to raise their game and remain successful.

As with any business decision, the potential commercial benefits – and risks – of diversification must be weighed up by all stakeholders, and the repercussions considered. What can start as a financially-motivated decision can soon morph into one which impacts on far broader relationships and individuals, so needs the full research and planning expected of any start-up business.

km

Ken McCracken is the co-founder and consultant at Withers Consulting Group