More than three-quarters of small businesses employees who participate in their firm’s 401(k) plan have well-constructed, appropriately diversified investment portfolios, in many cases because their employer placed them in a professionally managed investment option, according to Vanguard research.

Vanguard Retirement Plan Access 2014, the small business version of Vanguard’s How America Saves 2014 report on retirement planning trends and behaviors within 401(k) and other defined contribution (DC) plans that Vanguard administers, showed that 76% of participants in small company plans held broadly diversified investments in 2013. More than half of those participants did so through a professionally managed investment option of a target-date fund, another type of balanced fund, or a model portfolio.

Access deeper industry intelligence

Experience unmatched clarity with a single platform that combines unique data, AI, and human expertise.

Find out more

Many of those participants are in a professionally managed option because of action their employer took when it moved their plan to Vanguard Retirement Plan Access™ (VRPA), a service launched in 2011 to provide 401(k) and other plans to small businesses. During the switch to Vanguard, two-thirds of the plan sponsors chose to reenroll their participants’ assets into the plan’s qualified default investment alternative (QDIA). The QDIA consisted of a professionally managed balanced investment option, namely, a target-date fund (46% of participants held a single target-date fund), another type of balanced fund (4%), or a model portfolio (2%).

"Because these plan sponsors took such proactive steps, the portfolio construction of their participants tends to be strong," said Jean Young, author of Vanguard Retirement Plan Access 2014 and a senior analyst in Vanguard’s Center for Retirement Research. "We’re seeing a rapidly growing number of participants in plans of other sizes also take advantage of professionally managed investment options, particularly target-date funds, but the prevalent usage of these options so quickly in small plans is especially encouraging."

Vanguard Retirement Plan Access has grown rapidly since it launched and now has sufficient data to share through the report, which can be a useful tool for small business owners making decisions about offering quality workplace retirement plans and for retirement plan advisors working with business owners to design retirement plan features. "This report can be helpful to small business owners who already offer plans to determine how their plans compare with others, as well as to small employers considering whether to add a retirement plan to their benefit offerings," said Jing Wang, head of VRPA. "In particular, the report shows how proper plan design can have a positive impact on participants’ retirement savings."

Plan sponsors that moved their plans to, or started them at, VRPA also implemented many other important features that can help their participants save or invest wisely. For instance, 98% of those sponsors designate a qualified default investment alternative, 97% offer target-date funds, 73% offer a Roth feature that enables participants to contribute on an after-tax basis, and 99% offer catch-up contributions that enable participants age 50 and older to save an additional amount.

GlobalData Strategic Intelligence

US Tariffs are shifting - will you react or anticipate?

Don’t let policy changes catch you off guard. Stay proactive with real-time data and expert analysis.

By GlobalData

Fewer of these plans, however, automatically enroll participants or automatically increase their annual contributions. Only 19% of small plans had automatic enrollment, with 41% of those including an automatic annual contribution increase (compared to 34% and 69%, respectively, of larger plans).

Other key metrics used to assess retirement planning behaviors were on par with the broader Vanguard participant population tracked in How America Saves, including participation rates, participant contribution rates, Roth usage, and the percentage of participants contributing at the maximum statutory limit (both reports cite 2013 data). See the chart for comparisons.